Popular articles

PIR Center consultant Oleg Demidov describes the role of the Verisign corporation in the DNS root zone management, comments on the process U.S. Department of Trade’s withdrawal from direct contractual relationship with the technical management of the root zone, and looks at the potential impact of c...

In the aftermath of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), its Chair Ambassador Adam Bugajski of the Republic of Poland gave an exclusive interview to the Yaderny Kontrol bulletin ...


Some time ago the U.S. administration, including their former President Barack Obama, has voiced more and more often the idea that it would be desirable to continue strategic offensive reductions. There are several reasons why the United States are so interested in intensifying nuclear arms reduct...

All articles

Poll



 

authors

  • Affiliation : Director, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Middlebury Institute of International Studies
complete list

Letter to editor

William C. Potter

The outcome of the 2015 NPT Review Conference adjourned on May 22 in New York came to me as no surprise; nor did the fact that consensus broke down over the Middle East. The initial Arab League Document, pushed through by Egypt, was a very poor starting point for negotiations, and was not welcomed even by a number of Arab League states. Although the United States, the UK, and Canada took the floor to express their inability to support the draft Final Document circulated at a very late date by the Conference president, in fact her draft enjoyed only lukewarm support by most delegations — especially on the disarmament language — and many delegations appeared actually relieved by the conference outcome.

Full text


Imprint:

Security Index (Global Edition), No. 1 (110), Volume 21, Summer 2015

Comments

 
 
loading