China and Russia issued a joint statement that the creation of a global missile defense system does not contribute to maintaining strategic balance and stability
Tenex and the China Atomic Energy Corporation signed a contract for the construction of phase IV of the uranium enrichment in Hanzhong
The Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and the USA sign a protocol to the treaty between the USA and the USSR on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, also known as the Lisbon Protocol

International Security Index iSi




On May 2, more than 40 friends and partners of the PIR Center gathered at the Permanent Mission of Russia to the UN. Among them were heads and high representatives of delegations participating in the third session of the Preparatory Committee of the NPT Review Conference, the world's largest experts in the field of non-proliferation, graduates of PIR Center programs working in New York, young scientists and master students of double degree in the field of non-proliferation.


"Can it really be true that PIR Center is a quarter of a century old today? It would be a great occasion for a grand celebration, wouldn’t it. But I still cannot quite believe it.

When me and a tiny team of my associates were establishing PIR Center in the spring of 1994, working in a small room on the corner of Tverskaya Ulitsa and Strastny Boulevard overlooking the Pushkin statue in the very heart of Moscow, I could hardly imagine that this great institution would live long enough to see the new century and indeed the new millennium. If someone told me back at the time that it would mark its 25th anniversary in Moscow, Geneva and New York, or that greetings would be pouring in from all over the world to what is now a highly reputable international nongovernmental organization, I probably wouldn’t believe them. After all, how many fly-by-night NGOs have we all seen over the years – here today, gone tomorrow?," Vladimir Orlov, PIR Center Founder.


"Today a member of the PIR Center Executive Board, a member of the IMEMO (Institute of World Economy and International Relations) Directorate, Army General, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Hero of Russia Vyacheslav Trubnikov celebrates his 75th birthday. Vyacheslav Ivanovich, having reached the greatest heights of public service, you remained open to new ideas, plans and actions. We are happy to work with you for almost ten years! You are a source of soft, but mighty and attracting power, which is especially important in relations with the new generation of specialists – those who will construct a new world. Many well-known and beginning diplomats and military men, scientists and journalists throughout Eurasia are grateful for your inspiration and support, for your wise and precise judgement. We wish you good health, optimism and high spirits! We look forward to new meetings with you! Keep it up!" – PIR Center Director Albert Zulkharneev. 

Modern Arms Control and Disarmament

Modern Arms Control and Disarmament

(2 credits)

The course program developed by Gen. Evgeny Buzhinskiy, Chairman of the PIR Center’s Executive Board, 2018.


The course instructors: Gen. Evgeny P. Buzhinskiy; Dr. Alxey G. Arbatov; Dr. Andrey Y. Malov; Ms. A. Kockurova, Mr. Andrey Baklitskiy, Mr. Albert Zulkharneev, Mr. Adlan Margoev.   


1.1    The place and role of the course in the program of study:

The course Modern Arms Control and Disarmament aims at providing knowledge on the key aspects of modern arms control and prospects of international legal regulation of military uses of outer space and missile technologies. It also highlights these issues in the context of nonproliferation, implementation of the Article VI of the NPT, regional and global security. 

Huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons were accumulated on our planet from 1945. It is believed that the combined size of the nuclear arsenals peaked in the mid-1980s at about 62,000 warheads. The United States and the Soviet Union (succeeded by Russia) held 98 per cent of the world's nuclear weapons stockpiles; that proportion remains more or less unchanged to this day. The three other official nuclear-weapon states, i.e. China, France and Britain, hold several hundred warheads between them.

Paradoxically, the proliferation of nuclear arsenals was going in parallel with the strengthening of the nuclear disarmament agenda. The first treaty signed in an attempt to regulate the development of nuclear weapons was the 1963 Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which banned the testing of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere, in outer space, and under water. In 1968 numerous countries signed the multilateral Nuclear Weapons Non-Proliferation Treaty, which went on to become the most universal treaty in the entire history of world diplomacy. Article VI of the NPT now serves as the legal underpinning of progress towards a world free of nuclear weapons.

A few years later came the era of bilateral Soviet / Russian-American disarmament dialogue. For almost half a century all the efforts in the area of practical arms control, reduction and elimination of nuclear weapons were being undertaken mainly by the two largest nuclear powers, the Soviet Union (succeeded by Russia) and the United States. As a result of these joint efforts, the size of the global nuclear weapons stockpiles has shrunk by more than two-thirds since the mid-1980s. Meanwhile, other countries which possess nuclear weapons have either implemented much smaller reductions or even slightly increased the size of their arsenals. The need for multilateral (rather than bilateral) nuclear arms reduction measures is therefore becoming increasingly obvious. The signing of the 2010 New START Treaty by Russia and the United States has given a new impetus to the cause of nuclear disarmament.

At the same time arms control and disarmament agenda faces new challenges. These challenges grow up from development of new military technologies, change of world political order and new regional security crises, stagnation of multilateral negotiation and dialogue forums.

The course considers both historical and new elements of arms control, traditional and new factors, which influence prospects of disarmament, institutional and legal basis of arms control.

Bilateral and multilateral nuclear arms control and nuclear reductions will be considered within broader picture of new military technologies development, regional and global security issues.

The situation with missile defense is a perfect illustration of the effects of the factors which influence strategic stability and nuclear disarmament. So far Moscow and Washington have failed to agree on missile defense cooperation; this constitutes the main obstacle on the way towards deeper reductions of the two countries’ nuclear arsenals. The placement of weapons in space poses a substantial threat to strategic stability and global international security.  The growing number of countries expresses their interest to missile and space technologies. At the same time the international legal regulation of military use of space is still not well developed. There are new risks to missile technology control regime.


1.2 The course goals and objectives:

The main goal of the course is to provide students with basic knowledge of the current state and prospects of arms control as well as for the key factors, which influence disarmament process, risks and threats to future of disarmament negotiations, and risks and threats to global and regional security, connected with development of missile and military space technologies, national and international efforts to reduce these risks and develop legal and political framework for cooperation on arms control, disarmament and proliferation of missile technologies. 


Course objectives:

  1. To introduce basic definitions, concepts, history, current state, legal framework and institutional structure of nuclear arms control, nuclear reductions and disarmament, missile defence, military use of outer space and missile technology control.
  2. To orient students to understand the relationships between conventional and nuclear arms control, nonproliferation, offensive and defensive arms, space security, missile technologies control and regional and global security,
  3. To provide students with methodology of analysis of the arms control negotiations and documents, arms control issues within the broader regional and global security complex.


1.3    Learning outcomes:

Classes are generally held to provide knowledge and methodology for further analysis and discussion on the matter of the course.

Teaching methods used include lectures, consultations, discussions at the lectures and seminar.

By the end of this course students should be able to:

  1. Understand interrelations between nuclear arms control, conventional arms control, nonproliferation and disarmament, development of space and missile technologies and global security and development.
  2. Analyze keys vulnerabilities and risks of arms control and disarmament process, military use of outer space, missile control regime and current arms control.
  3. Analyze and compare national, international bilateral and multilateral initiatives and programs in the above mentioned spheres.
  4. Realize activities of national authorities and international organization on the spheres of the course. 
  5. Assess the efficiencies and deficiencies of the existing political and legal frameworks of international efforts on the topics of the course.  
  6. Search information literature on nuclear arms control, disarmament issues, and new arms control issues, distinguish between authoritative and unreliable sources on these issues.


1.4 Course requirements:

Students will be required to attend not less than 90% of classes and to be prepared for class discussions. Conscientious reading of the assigned materials is compulsory. All students are required to participate in seminar discussions. Average assessment will consist of three parts. First part is derived from students’ class active participation to assess their familiarity with the course material, including lectures and readings. The second part includes two provisional written tests during the course. The third part is participation in Rapid foresight.


Rapid Foresight is a system of interconnected actions that eventually lead to changes in the environment. The objective of a foresight is to create (formulate, shape) the vision of the future and general vector of development, as well as initiate a series of coordinated projects and programs of change (implemented by various interested parties) aimed at achieving this vision of the future[1]. We will apply this methodology of rapid foresight and organize our joint brain storming with the purpose to create our vision of future of arms control.


Those students who demonstrate successful result at the provisional tests (during the simulations and debates) will pass the final test automatically, in accordance with established MGIMO rules (if they take more than 70 points in average). Those who do not get pass automatically will have the final test.


1.5    Grading plan:

To get «А» (“excellent”) student should get 90 points, to get “pass”60 points.



Class and seminar active participation


Midterm tests (2 tests (15 questions*3 points + 1 open question* 5 points)


Rapid foresight



[1] Rapid Foresight. Methodology. P. 9. Moscow. 2017. 


Course outline & Literature (available in pdf)

Slides in pdf:

Gen Buzhinskiy, Part 1.

Gen Buzhinskiy, Part 2.

Gen Buzhinskiy, Part 3.

Mr. Baklitskiy, November 30. New Technologies and Arms Control