№ 7 (14), 2025. Comparing Approaches Towards Global Zero in the Modern Period

April 7, 2025

Nothing New Under the Sun

Despite the renewed interest in global zero and subsequent commitments by Moscow and Washington to bring forth global nuclear disarmament, cuts to the existing stockpiles were seen as underwhelming by disarmament activists and some NNWS while no other new concrete measures or clear obligations have been undertaken. Deterioration of the bilateral relationship spilled over into the NPT review process, further splitting the NWS and NNWS over the issue of disarmament. It clearly demonstrated that a whole array of significant strategic issues was hidden behind the nuclear disarmament commitments. Ultimately, further reliance on nuclear weapons as fundamental aspects of national security strategies, ongoing nuclear forces modernization, and further rapid deterioration of cooperative relationship ended the notion of possibility to make progress towards global zero through bilateral arms control in any foreseeable future.

Vladislav Chernavskikh
Research Assistant at the SIPRI Weapons of Mass Destruction Program

Amid the recent developments in tailoring of new concepts of the Global Zero revival caused by the utopian proposals of the New Trump’s administration in favor of a reconceptualization of the Strategic Stability Dialogue, we would like to recall the chapter written by Dr. Vladislav Chernavskikh, Research Assistant at the SIPRI Weapons of Mass Destruction Program, titled “Comparing Approaches Towards Global Zero in the Modern Period”, which was first published in PIR Center’s collective monograph  “Russia-U.S. Nuclear Nonproliferation Dialogue: Lessons Learned and Road Ahead” (2021).

Key Words: International Security; Strategic Stability; Arms Control; Russia-USA

AC

F13/AST – 25/04/07